Broderick Tower Official Thread

[Huggybear]

Higgins now has a steady income stream and no motivation to actually do anything with the buildings. He can continue to pocket the advertising incrome from now until the building collapses. Why should he invest the ad cash in a project that doesn't pencil when he can continue to collect the ad cash and take skiing trips to the Alps? He's owned the buildings for how many deacdes now?

Can he be divested of the ability to hang the ads under the agreements?

[48202]

Can he be divested of the ability to hang the ads under the agreements?

Wouldn’t that be vindictive?

[Huggybear]

Not if he misrepresented what he was doing with the money.

Wouldn’t that be vindictive?