LOL I can read okay but also when I read I look at long term growth and how a decision made today will affect the city and surrounding suburbs in the long term.
I read that the main play is based on the evil private enterprise and greed and using that emotion as a tool.
I read that the big three are heavy supporters as this will improve their delivery of products saving them time and money ,but somehow I find it hard for what ever reasons find to believe that those savings will be passed on in either increased wages or in the selling of a reduced priced automobile.So there is maybe a little greed factor in there. also.
I read that no other movers or shakers have come out and had any opinion on the matter.Other then the ones that will profit from it.
I read that one side wants the bridge built because it is destroying a neighborhood,forget about that that was a known effect of what would happen on the passing of NAFTA now it is an issue,but it is not an issue to wipe out a neighborhood on this side because it was a dump anyways right.
I read that transportation funds will become available that can be used for any purpose,so what are they going to be used for? Maybe to help fund a regional mass transit? I doubt it.
To me the bridge is mott it is in the limelight as a here and now today aspect without looking at the long term impacts,yes if you look just at the bridge it seems like a good deal and hard to pass up but one also needs to remember that there are others that see this as another link in a chain of events.It is important to also read about those events and look at the big picture to make a decision on if you are really comfortable with that decision.
Bookmarks