Quote Originally Posted by ghettopalmetto View Post
I'm still having an impossible time understanding how the demolition is the fault of the people who were trying to save Tiger Stadium. Where is the CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP between the actions of OTSC and the demolition? If I'm not mistaken, demolition could not have happened until the DEGC VOTED to demolish Tiger Stadium.

If someone's house falls to shit and the city condemns it, do you blame the neighborhood garden club for not saving it?
If the neighborhood garden club doesn't want to let the owner tear down the house that's, fallen to shit, and reaches an agreement with the owner to preserve the house. Wouldn't it be the neighborhood garden club's fault if they failed to live up to their end of the agreement?

As far as the owner was concerned, a chance was given to the neighborhood garden club. Taking advantage of that chance is the garden club's responsibility not the owner's. If something happens to someone in the house, who's going to be sued? The owner who has a lot of money and has a history of being sued and losing in court, or the neighborhood garden club that doesn't have any money?

Putting aside hypotheticals. there's no way an entity can seek a 33 million dollar renovation project and not be willing to take on any responsibility for the outcome. That's well beyond being naive, that's juvenile or childish behavior.