So, what is Bing's plan, ultimately? Apparently, they've already privatized operations, and that still obviously can only do so much. Are they trying to unwind this thing and sell it off in pieces? What's the end game, here? Run a few buses up the spokes and call it a day? Who picks up all of the lost ridership? Taxi services that'll gouge those with no other option even more than they already are?
In a city where in 2000, a full third of city residents didn't even own a car [[can you even imagine what it is now?), what kind of hope at any economic and educational development will you have when tens-of-thousands of people are trapped like rats in a city with few job opportunities and even fewer ways to reach those opportunities?
I just don't get it. Maybe, in other cities, cut service would be an option. As far as I'm concerned, mass transit is up there with police and fire in a city like Detroit. You can't keep cutting service and then wonder why crime and poverty and low school scores remain stubbornly high. I've already seen the administration come out with the talking point that over-night service only consitutes a tiny part of ridership, but this is cumulative. Everyone knows already shitty service is about to get shittier if that is even possible.
It's nights, now, and in a few months they'll be back to kill week-end serivce and then before you know it'll, we'll have a dozen routes in the central city of a region of over 4 million people where ridership isn't cut for lack of demand, but because the region doesn't want to pay for economic development on the front-end.
In a city as poor as Detroit, you either take the pain and pay for the social costs up front, or you pay out the @ss on the back-end. It's just that simple.
Bookmarks