Thought/question: If the city has the ability to tear down a building that is a problem and take the property/bill the owner, can they use similar powers to put up emergency stabilization measures and bill the owner? I'm guessing that would be an issue for the courts, ultimately, and/or a thought for the DEGC to consider before finding money to clear it. As with the Metro next door, the bricks aren't a structural issue, but they are a safety issue. Make them fix it now!!