Quote Originally Posted by mwilbert View Post
Because we don't have more money for funding today. The adjustment would come from the pensions going down rather than the funding going up. If you assume 4% you have to cut the pensions a lot more, so it is a relatively unattractive option.
Am I wrong that the whole idea here is to stop doing things for which we don't have the money? Otherwise we are no better than Kwame, rigging the game to our own benefit -- and harming our brethren.