Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 25 of 60

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    she must be in pretty rough shape to have an asking price that low. unless the price tag on the book is excessively high. most of the interior shots of the book tower show it's quite a mess. I like the idea of someone buying it as a single residence, but I don't know how you'd go about keeping people out of the other 33 floors.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by staticstate View Post
    she must be in pretty rough shape to have an asking price that low. unless the price tag on the book is excessively high. most of the interior shots of the book tower show it's quite a mess. I like the idea of someone buying it as a single residence, but I don't know how you'd go about keeping people out of the other 33 floors.
    I have a feeling that the price on the Book is absorbitantly high. $1.8M actually seems to be on par for buildings downtown, especially one that hasn't been ravaged by twenty years of abandonment.

  3. #3

    Default

    This article in today's Crain's Detroit Business may put the value of commercial real estate in perspective:
    http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article...FREE/100829958#

    The Hyatt was built in 1976, has 14 floors and has 772 rooms.

    Replacement cost is estimated to be $150 million
    Purchase in 2007 was $40 million -- equity of $8 million and a [[now defaulted0 loan of $32 million
    Now under contract for $12.5 million

    But the broker explains: "Chicago-based hotel broker Richard George, who listed the hotel, said the building is under contract as a $20 million sale, but the final price will be $12.5 due to a concession because of a structural issue with the hotel. He would not disclose the structural issue."

    So let's call the value of an operating Hyatt hotel to be $20 million after repairs. As a sale comparable, that means hotels of this caliber are worth about $26,000 per room.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by staticstate View Post
    I like the idea of someone buying it as a single residence, but I don't know how you'd go about keeping people out of the other 33 floors.
    In my mind, that's why you continue to rent out the existing office space, which is presumably in a decent enough state, and use that income to pay the operating expenses associated with a ground floor concierge and doorman, elevator maintenance, and so on. Because what are you going to do if the elevator breaks, take 35 flights of stairs for the rest of your life?

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fryar View Post
    In my mind, that's why you continue to rent out the existing office space, which is presumably in a decent enough state, and use that income to pay the operating expenses associated with a ground floor concierge and doorman, elevator maintenance, and so on. Because what are you going to do if the elevator breaks, take 35 flights of stairs for the rest of your life?
    If they are single floor units, you walk out of the elevator, and there is one door... been in a couple in New York and Chicago. Single floors in such buildings are 3,000 square feet and are set up to be a single family residence in the city.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.