I hate seeing Detroit's unique housing stock stripped also, but I don't think a new ordinance would change this. First of all, theft is against the law so technically this is already illegal. Second, municipal ordinances can only create misdemeanors, not felonies. Third, Council's edicts barely have effect downtown, much less throughout the city.
I can look out my window and see numerous blight violations every day - these are purely stationary offenses, no need to run to catch the offender - and the city seems to be unable to enforce the property maintenance code. We have an ongoing problem in my neighborhood with illegal dumping of rubbish etc on vacant properties or lots. This also is against the law.
How the heck is the city supposed to stop strippers from entering unsecured, vacant properties in the dead of night to strip fixtures etc??? This is a very real and practical question that needs to be answered before drafting a new ordinance.
In a city where the cops spend a large amount of time dealing with crimes against human beings, property crimes in unoccupied dwellings go way down in terms of priority.
Bookmarks