Carl Sagan A Glorious Dawn

[elganned]

You're correct, rb336, it hasn't been demonstrated to be corrupted.

But even if it has, that does not automatically obviate all the rest of the research, which is the basis for Cc's sweeping generalization--what he is pleased to call "pure logic", even though it is anything but.

[ccbatson]

All datasets, by these "scientists" [[term used loosely) are corrupt...and looking forward, without credibility.

[Stosh]

All datasets, by these "scientists" [[term used loosely) are corrupt...and looking forward, without credibility.

Hey that means that the scientists and you are exactly alike! go_figure !

[rb336]

All datasets, by these "scientists" [[term used loosely) are corrupt...and looking forward, without credibility.

There is nothing corrupt about them, bub. not one thing. your deficient understanding of the scientific method and process [[which you have dmonstrated time and time again) merely renders you incapable of understanding the context and the facts, and leaves you susceptible to those who prey on the ignorant

[ccbatson]

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/corrupt

Nah...1000+ emails detailing how to fudge/alter/obfuscate/mislead/falsify data and the conclusions made from said data isn't corrupt in the least...bub [[isn't that something Edward G Robinson would say in a 1930s gangster film?)