Here's one article from the Detroit Free Press about Matty wanting to turn MCS into a casino, but you have to pay to view it and I don't have a membership. I know I saw an article somewhere where it quoted Matty saying he applied for a casino license for the MCS and was denied, but I can't find it. Could be Crain's.
^ a b c Aguilar, Louis [[4-8-2008).Michigan Central Depot owners say 'Roll 'em!'.The Detroit News. Retrieved on July 29, 2008.
The quote was from this Wikopedia section
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Central_Station
- Convention Center and Casino - Ambassador Bridge owner Manuel J. "Matty" Moroun,[2] proposed that Michigan Central Station be restored as the centerpiece of a new convention center, possibly combined with a casino. Such a project could cost $1.2 billion, including $300 million to restore the station. Dan Stamper, president of Detroit International Bridge, noted that the station should have been used as one of the city's casinos.[3]
That doesn't even imply that he made a formal request for a license. It even says "possibly" combined with a casino, which makes me think that if there was a casino plan, it never went further than Matty and Stamper's noggins. The point in all of this is the ridiculousness in blaming the state for not giving them something that only they can request. If anything, that article points to the casino idea being an after-thought, and something that Matty never formally made known to the people that would consider granting him a casino license.Here's one article from the Detroit Free Press about Matty wanting to turn MCS into a casino, but you have to pay to view it and I don't have a membership. I know I saw an article somewhere where it quoted Matty saying he applied for a casino license for the MCS and was denied, but I can't find it. Could be Crain's.
^ a b c Aguilar, Louis [[4-8-2008).Michigan Central Depot owners say 'Roll 'em!'.The Detroit News. Retrieved on July 29, 2008.
The quote was from this Wikopedia section
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Central_Station
- Convention Center and Casino - Ambassador Bridge owner Manuel J. "Matty" Moroun,[2] proposed that Michigan Central Station be restored as the centerpiece of a new convention center, possibly combined with a casino. Such a project could cost $1.2 billion, including $300 million to restore the station. Dan Stamper, president of Detroit International Bridge, noted that the station should have been used as one of the city's casinos.[3]
You're not listening. That's just one article back in 2008. I've seen many more which clearly stated it, but they were removed. He said he wanted it as a casino years ago and applied and was denied. Then he brought the issue back up in this article in 2008. Whether it's a head nod or not is irrelevant because they never called him out on it by granting it. If the Governor even offered him a casino license if he restored it just verbally [[even if it was just to call him out to see if he was full or it or not), I'd think otherwise. But, she never did. The State is very clear on there being only three casinos in Detroit and no more.That doesn't even imply that he made a formal request for a license. It even says "possibly" combined with a casino, which makes me think that if there was a casino plan, it never went further than Matty and Stamper's noggins. The point in all of this is the ridiculousness in blaming the state for not giving them something that only they can request. If anything, that article points to the casino idea being an after-thought, and something that Matty never formally made known to the people that would consider granting him a casino license.
You're not listening. That's just one article back in 2008. I've seen many more which clearly stated it, but they were removed. He said he wanted it as a casino years ago and applied and was denied. Then he brought the issue back up in this article in 2008. Whether it's a head nod or not is irrelevant because they never called him out on it by granting it. If the Governor even offered him a casino license if he restored it just verbally [[even if it was just to call him out to see if he was full or it or not), I'd think otherwise. But, she never did. The State is very clear on there being only three casinos in Detroit and no more.
DIBC had a full color plan made up for the entire Roosevelt park/MCS casino idea too it was pretty interesting to see how they made everything work out, shame it wasn't approved it was very modern and "Vegas"
Casino might have worked, and I always thought Kwame had a good idea when he wanted to turn it in to the DPD headquarters.
MCS photo
Last edited by rajdet; November-30-09 at 08:10 AM.
I posted such a comparison on here about 4 years ago, after visiting the train station in Kansas City. Their efforts proved to be well worth it, as the station looks beautiful, is occupied by Amtrak, and numerous other businesses and educational facilities such as a science center and Imax.
Comparing apples to oranges? Hardly! The projects could be looked at seperately, the tower as one, the main floor/lobby of the train station as another. Or, the possibility of tearing down the tower, or perhaps disassembling the tower, in much the same was at the Lafayette, and keep perhaps 5-6 levels.
Perhaps most disturbing though is the fact that a billionaire several times over can't even drop enough cash on the place to put a new roof on the place and properly secure. As if he couldn't afford several dozen $8/hr security guards to secure the place. The guy is reaching the end of his life and is more concerned about building another bridge as a legacy to himself, when in fact restoring the train station would offer a much greater legacy. The station is probably the most photographed, most recognizable, and iconic eyesore in Detroit. Restoring the place to its former glory would not only receive local recogniztion, but also on an international level.
Instead, any one of Detroit's thousands of slumlords could own the place, and it would be in the exact same condition. All the while, our city politicians label such places as "dangerous." Really? Have people been killed or raped inside on a regular basis? Bodies stuffed inside it's many rooms? Are drug dealers setting up shop at the place? Nope. The REAL dangerous buildings reside in the neighborhoods of Detroit, not amongst Detroit's skyline. Though you don't get the kind of recognition and media coverage for announcing you just passed a resolution to tear down a vacant dwelling taken over by drug trade. It's time the city reassesses exactly what a "dangerous" building is.
Why are you letting the City off the hook for their failure to enforce building codes? The only hand the City of Detroit has played has been to schedule the building for demolition, with the threat that Maroun's money would magically pay for the demolition [[I'm not sure how they intend to actually squeeze blood out of that turnip.).
Perhaps most disturbing though is the fact that a billionaire several times over can't even drop enough cash on the place to put a new roof on the place and properly secure. As if he couldn't afford several dozen $8/hr security guards to secure the place. The guy is reaching the end of his life and is more concerned about building another bridge as a legacy to himself, when in fact restoring the train station would offer a much greater legacy. The station is probably the most photographed, most recognizable, and iconic eyesore in Detroit. Restoring the place to its former glory would not only receive local recogniztion, but also on an international level.
While it's nice to dream. This is never going to happen. The only thing I could see working is... Nope. Maybe an intermodal transportation station. It would certainly help develop the Michigan Ave. corridor, could also tie into the Woodward plan.
Ahhhhh, in any other city this wouldn't be a pipe dream...
Don't you know? Detroit is *different* from everywhere else. Things that work in other cities just don't work in Detroit. It's impossible!
Tear that schitt down! Make a landscaped, lighted parking lot! Make a "temporary" [[skid row) park! Build an underground parking garage there. Anything!
Having to look at old buildings like MCS is keeping all the developers away!!!
Isn't the problem is that Detroit IS different than the other cities mentioned here? Detroit leads the nation in virtually ever negative economic indicator. From unemployment rates to literacy rates to population decline to economic activity. A half billion in public dollars spent to renovate a white elephant owned by a slumlord could probably be directed elsewhere. [[the travesty of letting the slumlord BE a slumlord is a reality that is pointless to debate...it is what it is, the man is now and forever, an untouchable.)Don't you know? Detroit is *different* from everywhere else. Things that work in other cities just don't work in Detroit. It's impossible!
Tear that schitt down! Make a landscaped, lighted parking lot! Make a "temporary" [[skid row) park! Build an underground parking garage there. Anything!
Having to look at old buildings like MCS is keeping all the developers away!!!
At least we should see if the half billion spent and herculean efforts to get the Book and Ft.Shelby up and running is actually going to pay off. I think everyone will agree the jury is still out on that.
Setting aside the huge amount of money in public dollars that will be required, lets look at what the others were renovated for-- Detroit has a science museum and a museum district, it's no where near MCS. Detroit does not have mass transit [[and even the most grandiose future plans do not include the MCS in any way), Amtrack relocated from MSC to New Center....they are not moving back. Detroit has no ability to sustain a Mall, or offices in it's CBD, why would a mall and office development make sense for MCS's isolated and sketchy location?
I want it saved as much as the next guy, and i'm not advocating for it's demolition, but what surely seems like the insurmountable issue for it's preservation/renovation is; "what for"?
It currently seems to be serving the only purpose for which the market will sustain... a location for the shooting of post-apocalyptic/dystopian movies.
Last edited by bailey; November-30-09 at 11:50 AM.
"....Two things Nashville and Kansas City had going in their favor are money and committed local supporters -- public and private -- pushing to save the structures....
There was such a ground swell following the council's vote to demolish the depot. Facebook groups calling to "Save Detroit's Michigan Central Station" sprang up.
And, members of Preservation Wayne, the Greater Detroit Historic Preservation Coalition and the Detroit Historic District Commission showed their support for restoring the station by taking a group photo there this summer. They were inspired by the National Trust for Historic Preservation's "This Place Matters" initiative."
No comment necessary.
What, pray tell, do you mean by "no comment necessary"?"....Two things Nashville and Kansas City had going in their favor are money and committed local supporters -- public and private -- pushing to save the structures....
There was such a ground swell following the council's vote to demolish the depot. Facebook groups calling to "Save Detroit's Michigan Central Station" sprang up.
And, members of Preservation Wayne, the Greater Detroit Historic Preservation Coalition and the Detroit Historic District Commission showed their support for restoring the station by taking a group photo there this summer. They were inspired by the National Trust for Historic Preservation's "This Place Matters" initiative."
No comment necessary.
Again, the thing to remember is that Kansas City Union Station and Cincinatti Union Terminal consist of head buildings and train sheds. There is no office tower in either location, and that's one of the problems with renovating MCS, and a problem that the folks in Buffalo have to deal with. What do you do with a basically useless tower that's going to need a ton of money to renovate. The saving and restoration of both MCS and Buffalo Central Terminal would be a lot easier if the head building was all they had to deal with.
Absolutely... if it were just the head house, midway and train shed... it would be much easier as far as restoration goes.Again, the thing to remember is that Kansas City Union Station and Cincinatti Union Terminal consist of head buildings and train sheds. There is no office tower in either location, and that's one of the problems with renovating MCS, and a problem that the folks in Buffalo have to deal with. What do you do with a basically useless tower that's going to need a ton of money to renovate. The saving and restoration of both MCS and Buffalo Central Terminal would be a lot easier if the head building was all they had to deal with.
As nice as the Roosevelt Park frontage to the MCS is, it pales by comparison to that of Cincinnati's Union Terminal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ci...n-Terminal.jpg
But didn't they destroy most of the train concourses in both Detroit and Cincinnati?
Last edited by Gistok; November-30-09 at 05:58 PM.
Other than the train sheds being torn down, an some added drop ceilings, the train station is the same that it was some 90 odd years ago.
The Cincinnati station was nothing less than gutted.
Other than the plaster rotting off the walls, and the heating, cooling, and plumbing pipes removed or ruined, it's in perfectly fine shape, I suppose.
And therein lies the problem. It's not just an issue of adding windows and paint. The MCS would require all new building systems--HVAC, electrical, plumbing, and vertical transportation. Structure might have to be repaired and/or reinforced, depending on use. There's restoration of historic elements. The building envelope would have to be examined and made weather-tight.
Well apparently it wasn't obvious I was replying to Gistok and him asking about the concourse.
See in Cincinnati they completely got rid of the train aspect from what I understand, where at MCS everything related to trains [[save for the sheds) still exists. No one ever got rid of the subway tunnel to the trains, if they relaid track and things started over, a passenger could still get to their train the same way they did almost 100 years ago.
Cincinnati, no dice
Who or what was that post in reply to, mcsdetroitfriend?
mcs... I don't remember a casino bid for Maroun? Maybe he was rejected early on... weren't there something like 9 serious bidders?
Among the losers were Steve Wynn [[Mirage), Don Barden and Donald Trump.
I also remember that Ontario had a rule that none of their Casino Windsor operators could be bidders... which is why Circus Circus [[later became Madalay Bay) opted out of their partnership there with Harrah's, and they became majority owner of MotorCity before their merger with MGM [[and subsequent sale of MotorCity to Marion Ilitch).
This is correct. People are confusing Don Barden with this Maroun clown because of the close physical proximity of the Central Station to Barden's proposed casino in the river front fields next to River Front Towers behind the post office. Maroun never sought to own a Detroit casino.mcs... I don't remember a casino bid for Maroun? Maybe he was rejected early on... weren't there something like 9 serious bidders?
Among the losers were Steve Wynn [[Mirage), Don Barden and Donald Trump.
I also remember that Ontario had a rule that none of their Casino Windsor operators could be bidders... which is why Circus Circus [[later became Madalay Bay) opted out of their partnership there with Harrah's, and they became majority owner of MotorCity before their merger with MGM [[and subsequent sale of MotorCity to Marion Ilitch).
Other than the few news articles I saw online [[summaries). The plans were labeled something along the lines of casino/police station. It was like a 20 year master plan
and "amshack" is awesome, word of the week!
|
Bookmarks