Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 63

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Bing considers Belle Isle Entry Fee

    http://michiganmessenger.com/26759/b...isle-entry-fee

    It is very important that the public raises out their voice on this.

    Personally, I'm against the idea of an entry fee for Belle Isle. I would be more agreeable if there was a fee for vehicles not for bicyclists and pedestrians.

    However, we already pay for it with our city taxes. Why should we be forced to pay more when we already pay for its maintenance?

  2. #2

    Default

    Fantastic idea to charge automotive vehicles only. The Isle desperately needs an income stream so that regular upkeep can be maintained. I love this park and would love to see it upkept to a higher standard, which will only come with more money.

    Plus, a fee for automotive vehicles only may decrease the amount of vehicles coming onto the Isle, thus making the experience at the park THAT much better - less noise, less music blaring, less street racing and most importantly, LESS POLLUTION

  3. #3
    Retroit Guest

    Default

    I support it. It may be good to have a higher fee on the weekends and evenings during the summer months.

  4. #4

    Default

    We should truly have toll roads - statewide and disperse the earnings to expenditures such as Road repair, MASS TRANSIT and parks

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmorrison12 View Post
    We should truly have toll roads - statewide and disperse the earnings to expenditures such as Road repair, MASS TRANSIT and parks

    I dont know, I'm from Ann Arbor, and I make frequent trips to the D for Mexican food and photography, events, the DIA, and things like that. My trips would be a lot less frequent if i had to pay to enter the city.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmorrison12 View Post
    Fantastic idea to charge automotive vehicles only. The Isle desperately needs an income stream so that regular upkeep can be maintained. I love this park and would love to see it upkept to a higher standard, which will only come with more money.

    Plus, a fee for automotive vehicles only may decrease the amount of vehicles coming onto the Isle, thus making the experience at the park THAT much better - less noise, less music blaring, less street racing and most importantly, LESS POLLUTION
    I'm glad you agree with me. I'm sure that by looking at the island that most of the park would be a lot cleaner with less cars. I just hope that Mayor Bing can agree to that. However, should the pedestrians and bicyclists have to pay a fee, it can become a problem.

  7. #7

    Default

    It's disappointing to hear but understandable. Hopefully the charge will be at a minimum for residents, while non-residents have to pay a inflated entrance fee.
    Conservatory is one my favorite parts of the city.

  8. #8
    crawford Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tig3rzhark View Post
    However, we already pay for it with our city taxes. Why should we be forced to pay more when we already pay for its maintenance?
    You already pay for city buses. Why should you be forced to pay more when you ride a bus.

    You already pay for city streets. Why should you be forced to pay more when you park at a meter.

    You already pay for city pools and recreation centers. Why should you be forced to pay more to visit a recreation center?

    Should I go on? Museums, City Permits, Cobo, etc.

  9. #9

    Default

    If utilized properly, Belle Isle could be self-sustaining. It's funny to see Authority's and Corporation's thrown together with spit and barbed wire to run Cobo and the Eastern Market. Yet, an organization such as the Friends of Belle Isle has been around for decades, doing good work, and receives little or no consideration from the powers that be. They could probably turn the island around if given just half the resources that already exist.

  10. #10

    Default

    The city should find a way to charge people for crossing the city border.

  11. #11
    Retroit Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by izzyindetroit View Post
    The city should find a way to charge people for crossing the city border.
    To discourage people from entering or leaving?

  12. #12

    Default

    Cutting bus service? Charging to get onto Belle Isle? Hmmmm. Do you guys get the sense that Bing is a little clueless about rank-and-file Detroiters?

  13. #13

    Default

    Or maybe he's just "clued in" to the fact that city expenditures, as they exist now, are unsustainable and that some painful choices have to be made or else it's receivership.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Detroitnerd View Post
    Cutting bus service? Charging to get onto Belle Isle? Hmmmm. Do you guys get the sense that Bing is a little clueless about rank-and-file Detroiters?
    I agree with Motown Spartan. I think the reality is that Bing is facing an enormous deficit, and is trying prevent the city from going into receivership or bankruptcy. As a result, some measures like this might be necessary. I think it is very important, however, that when considering new fees like this, that they not be set at a rate that will discourage people from visiting.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
    To discourage people from entering or leaving?
    When was the last time you were discouraged to travel to Chicago or Cedar Point because there was a fee to use the expressway?

  16. #16
    Stosh Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by izzyindetroit View Post
    The city should find a way to charge people for crossing the city border.
    And vice versa.

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by izzyindetroit View Post
    The city should find a way to charge people for crossing the city border.
    That's a good idea and charge a fee to enter Belle Island should have been done along time ago to generate money for the cash strapped city. If there were a fee to enter the city, it would provide me with more discouragement to come, but I have no desire although entrance is free. So, they can charge whatever they like, I am for it!

  18. #18

    Default

    Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pound ought and six, result misery.

    Charles Dickens, David Copperfield, 1849
    English novelist [[1812 - 1870)

  19. #19

    Default

    In one of the other threads about this, the math was done, and if there were a small fee for vehicles, it would raise a ton of money for the island, and the island needs money.

  20. #20

    Default

    It it means to save Detroit from going broke, so be it. Have that entry fee for Belle Isle Park established.

  21. #21

    Default

    Only the riffraff will have a problem with the fee? You guys, if you're serious about this, and want it passed, should probably shy away from those sorts of comments. You know, keep it tight. We've all got to make some sacrifices. It will improve the park for everybody. That sort of stuff. Or else you might sound like PERSON 1 and PERSON 2.

  22. #22

    Default

    Has the Belle Isle Master Plan been revised or updated? It appeared as though the same plan and same amount [[180 Million) floated around for over a decade with nothing ever happening. If memory serves me correctly, Archer wanted a fee on Belle Isle. That way, a bond could be taken out and the proceeds from the entrance fee would be used to pay back the bond. If that is Bing's plan, he's going to have to do some serious updating, in order to, account for inflation and our current bond status. At the time Archer developed the plan, Detroit had an excellent Bond Rating.

  23. #23

    Default

    Does anyone have any projections as to how much money such an entry fee would generate?

    Or any current estimates as to how many people visit Belle Isle on an annual basis so one could make at least somewhat reliable estimates?

  24. #24

    Default

    I think its a good idea and bad. I wouldn't mind the small fee but wouldn't want the hassle to pay for it. Maybe a yearly pass? On the other hand maybe this fee would filter out the riff raff that has no respect for the island. These are the kind that WOULD have a problem with the fee.

  25. #25

    Default

    I think a automobile fee + an extra fee, if non-resident, is fair. My main concern would be that the city budget for Belle Isle would be cut by whatever revenue is generated such that BI budget would remain flat.

    All in all I am happy to say that BI is in the best condition it has been in decades. The only real 'eye sores' are the zoo and some of small abandoned maintenance building on the east end of the complex. However they finally pull down the ivy and painted the main building. IMO they should demolish the zoo and return it to forest. It could also do with a major Canadian goose 'harvest.'

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.