Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 25 of 33

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GPCharles View Post
    I hate Comerica - Buy seats in the lower deck close to the field for a day game on a warm summer day and you will absolutely fry. Nothing but sun and no air circulation. Check out the concrete on the stairs to the upper deck - it's all cracking and coming up in chunks. Ever notice how many holes were drilled into the concrete and subsequently filled with caulk or silicone?
    Couldn't agree more. I never liked that park from the get-go. Anybody who thinks Comerica Park is a better place to watch a baseball game than Tiger Stadium was needs to get their head examined.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by softailrider View Post
    Couldn't agree more. I never liked that park from the get-go. Anybody who thinks Comerica Park is a better place to watch a baseball game than Tiger Stadium was needs to get their head examined.
    You gotta remember that old Tiger Stadium [[nee Briggs, nee Navin) was rusting apart. Would have cost a fortune to make necessary repairs. Was easier to build the new ball park. Nothing is forever. Except me, of course.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ray1936 View Post
    ... Nothing is forever. Except me, of course.
    LOL! I'm going to steal that one and put it on my tombstone.

    Name:  tombstone.jpg
Views: 238
Size:  37.0 KB
    Last edited by Jimaz; April-06-24 at 02:30 PM.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ray1936 View Post
    You gotta remember that old Tiger Stadium [[nee Briggs, nee Navin) was rusting apart. Would have cost a fortune to make necessary repairs. Was easier to build the new ball park. Nothing is forever. Except me, of course.
    The outfield dimensions are ridicules. A ballpark built for small ball in a home run world. They've moved the fences in twice or maybe three time and it still sucks.

    Got to wonder what Mr. I was thinking.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by softailrider View Post
    The outfield dimensions are ridicules. A ballpark built for small ball in a home run world. They've moved the fences in twice or maybe three time and it still sucks.

    Got to wonder what Mr. I was thinking.
    At the time, they were in the AL East. The thinking was since they couldn't compete with Boston & NY for free agents they would win with pitching and defense, similar to KC. Of course they never built a team that way and ended up moving to the Central anyway. Ilitch decided to spend big when he realized his window for winning and living was running out.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 401don View Post
    At the time, they were in the AL East. The thinking was since they couldn't compete with Boston & NY for free agents they would win with pitching and defense, similar to KC. Of course they never built a team that way and ended up moving to the Central anyway. Ilitch decided to spend big when he realized his window for winning and living was running out.
    It's always seemed nuts to me that MLB teams get to decide the dimensions of their parks as opposed to a standardized dimension.

  7. #7

    Default

    I am not a fan of the giant scoreboard [read: distraction], the noise, or baking in the sun at Comerica.

    On a related note, I tried to take my kids to LCA for a hockey game and felt like I needed ear plugs to physically stay in the arena. We left early.

    1953

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikeg19 View Post
    It's always seemed nuts to me that MLB teams get to decide the dimensions of their parks as opposed to a standardized dimension.
    I have to disagree about that. Part of what makes baseball fun is the widely varying dimensions and unique aspects of each park. It developed from baseball's early days when, as popularity grew and seating expanded, they had to fit the seats into the city block where the park was built. There would have been no overhang in right field at Tiger Stadium, etc. otherwise. How boring were all the cookie cutter stadiums in the National League in the '70's? Sure that was partly because they were multi-sport but also because every park had the same dimensions in right, right center and left and left center.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikeg19 View Post
    It's always seemed nuts to me that MLB teams get to decide the dimensions of their parks as opposed to a standardized dimension.
    I'm not a baseball fan. I have A LOT of criticism for baseball and how SLOW and BORING it is. However, the unique park dimensions has always been a win for baseball in my eyes.

    The sport lends itself to make the unique dimensions possible. It wouldn't work for hockey, basketball, or football. But for baseball, it makes sense. It also makes visiting other cities and watching baseball games in their parks more enjoyable because each stadium can be so unique.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scottathew View Post
    I have A LOT of criticism for baseball and how SLOW and BORING it is.
    The pitch clock has really made the game move along. If you haven't watched a game last year or this year, you might be surprised.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.