Yes, you never said NYC had NO industry. You said NYC *NEVER* had a particularly large manufacturing or industrial base relative to other Northeastern or Midwestern cities. And that is a categorical statement. And it's nonsense. Never is what we call a Long Fucking Time, including every decade since the big bang. Can you say that New York wasn't a major manufacturer relative to other cities in the areas you designate ALWAYS? In the 1780s? Or the 1820s? Or the 1860s? You see where I'm going with this? History didn't begin in 1914, Jack.
Heck, even after World War I, New York was a major industrial center. You know what was on the shore of what's now called Williamsburg? Look at your old maps. You'll see it ringed with piers and rail lines, with the tanks of the Standard Oil company. You'll see tanks dotting the playfields and along Newton Creek. That is distinctly blue-collar. And the Brooklyn Navy Yard wasn't a big industrial installation. Naw, it just had a bunch of foundries, warehouses, machine shops, dry docks and shit like that. Really just sort of a big yacht club. And Camden Yards is obviously wrong [[good catch). I mean Hoboken.
Let's face facts: The white-collar, trade-oriented employment is a factor in New York, but the idea that New York NEVER was a center of manufacturing is silly. For many points in its history, Chicago didn't exist and Detroit was a tiny frontier town.
Bookmarks