This one's kind of funny. It's hard to imagine an attorney would try to get away with it.
IMHO the title should say "Fails to Win" instead of "Loses."
Lawfirm Loses $60K Relying on ChatGPT in the Courtroom
This one's kind of funny. It's hard to imagine an attorney would try to get away with it.
IMHO the title should say "Fails to Win" instead of "Loses."
Lawfirm Loses $60K Relying on ChatGPT in the Courtroom
If Artificial Intelligence Was Honest
Honest Ads [ChatGPT, A.I. Parody]
What if AI companies like Chat GPT were actually honest about how horrifically terrible they are? Roger Horton investigates.
LOL. Steve Lehto is great.
This kind of drives the point home. Large language models like ChatGPT *only* understands the relationships between words. If you ask for information about George Washington, and the model had been trained on novels called "George Washington In Space," or "George Washington Time Traveler" those would be in the constellation of knowledge attached to George Washington. That doesn't mean those "facts" would come up often, as "Mount Vernon" would show up in a lot more books regarding Washington than "Mars," so it would have a greater weight. But, that fictional stuff is still in the network, and there would be a possibility of it popping up.
|
Bookmarks