Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 25 of 42

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Brooks became OC Executive in 1992

    Coleman retired in 1994 and for the last two years of his term he rarely left Manoogian and rarely got out of his pajamas.

    You folks have imagined big fights between Brooks and Colemen. It is akin to having a serious discussion over who would win an egg rolling contest: Batman or Superman.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gnome View Post
    Brooks became OC Executive in 1992

    Coleman retired in 1994 and for the last two years of his term he rarely left Manoogian and rarely got out of his pajamas.

    You folks have imagined big fights between Brooks and Colemen. It is akin to having a serious discussion over who would win an egg rolling contest: Batman or Superman.


    The love fest started before he was OC exec. Here's an excerpt from a Newyorker article:

    At one point, Young, who had already irritated Patterson by referring to Oakland County as “the cornfields,” called him a racist for having represented the anti-busing organization. Patterson fired back on the op-ed page: “If favoring the neighborhood school and opposing the attempt to make schoolchildren pawns of the federal court social experiment makes me a racist, then I plead guilty. If opposing Coleman Young’s $600 million Detroit subway, an extravagant and ineffective testament to his ego, makes me a racist, then I plead guilty. . . . If publicly stating . . . that future economic bailouts for Detroit are at an end until Detroit gets its own fiscal house in order makes me a racist, then I plead guilty.”

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GMan View Post
    The love fest started before he was OC exec. Here's an excerpt from a Newyorker article:

    At one point, Young, who had already irritated Patterson by referring to Oakland County as “the cornfields,” called him a racist for having represented the anti-busing organization. Patterson fired back on the op-ed page: “If favoring the neighborhood school and opposing the attempt to make schoolchildren pawns of the federal court social experiment makes me a racist, then I plead guilty. If opposing Coleman Young’s $600 million Detroit subway, an extravagant and ineffective testament to his ego, makes me a racist, then I plead guilty. . . . If publicly stating . . . that future economic bailouts for Detroit are at an end until Detroit gets its own fiscal house in order makes me a racist, then I plead guilty.”
    Funny. I just think of all the money and effort that went into these postwar missile defense systems both in Detroit and adjacent cornfields. How extravagan t! Coleman woulda put a subway in Detroit and he's still seen as a shill for promoting all that is bigoted and incendiary and counterproductive in metro Detroit. Mr Patterson continues as the undisputed king of Sprawl. Why should he change his recipe of countering the core city's effort at centering itself as the naturally occurring hub of the region? People keep voting him in...

    Your post illustrates beyond question the dismal condition of Detroit's situation in the region when political forces refuse to acknowledge the preeminence of the central city. It has hurt the economic and social cohesion in many ways and undermines cultural destiny in a city that might have proved a model in diversity if the cards had been dealt fairly early on.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canuck View Post
    Funny. I just think of all the money and effort that went into these postwar missile defense systems both in Detroit and adjacent cornfields. How extravagan t! Coleman woulda put a subway in Detroit and he's still seen as a shill for promoting all that is bigoted and incendiary and counterproductive in metro Detroit. Mr Patterson continues as the undisputed king of Sprawl. Why should he change his recipe of countering the core city's effort at centering itself as the naturally occurring hub of the region? People keep voting him in...

    Your post illustrates beyond question the dismal condition of Detroit's situation in the region when political forces refuse to acknowledge the preeminence of the central city. It has hurt the economic and social cohesion in many ways and undermines cultural destiny in a city that might have proved a model in diversity if the cards had been dealt fairly early on.

    No it doesn't illustrate beyond question that the condition of Detroit is because Coleman didn't get a subway.
    Detroit had it's share of federal dollars for projects that went to friends of the mayor. Building that subway wouldn't have changed the fact that people were still moving out. Schools were in a decline. Crime was ramping up. Arson was Detroit's favorite pastime. If I had a dollar for every time I heard: if we just build this stadium, it will bring jobs and people back to Detroit.
    Meanwhile we couldn't get a policeman to our neighborhood unless we threatened to take matters into our own hands. Street lights out, too bad.
    Sewers plugged. Your on the list
    Basically if the subway would have been built, Detroit would've had a hole in the ground. Maybe that could have been an attraction.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GMan View Post
    No it doesn't illustrate beyond question that the condition of Detroit is because Coleman didn't get a subway.
    Detroit had it's share of federal dollars for projects that went to friends of the mayor. Building that subway wouldn't have changed the fact that people were still moving out. Schools were in a decline. Crime was ramping up. Arson was Detroit's favorite pastime. If I had a dollar for every time I heard: if we just build this stadium, it will bring jobs and people back to Detroit.
    Meanwhile we couldn't get a policeman to our neighborhood unless we threatened to take matters into our own hands. Street lights out, too bad.
    Sewers plugged. Your on the list
    Basically if the subway would have been built, Detroit would've had a hole in the ground. Maybe that could have been an attraction.
    Only problem is if you meant to discount Patterson's avowed racism and substitute it with common sense arguments, it doesn't fly.

    The truth is Young wasn't there long enough to have had a cultural economic decline caused by his leadership, and a black urban majority alone. The lack of gelling in the metro community at large is to blame. It had more to do with uncooperative behavior on all counts. You can of course make a point for the African American community's lacking in business and other skills for many social ailments. Historically, you would need to agree to a shared responsibility on the part of whites and blacks for racist and unprogressive agendas that plumbed Detroit. Why not recognize the faults amd move toward betterment? Why harken for a time of miserable conditions by voting for neanderthals like Trump and Patterson? Coleman Young was bitter, but he had more reason to be than any other mayor in the USofA at that time.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canuck View Post
    Only problem is if you meant to discount Patterson's avowed racism and substitute it with common sense arguments, it doesn't fly.

    The truth is Young wasn't there long enough to have had a cultural economic decline caused by his leadership, and a black urban majority alone. The lack of gelling in the metro community at large is to blame. It had more to do with uncooperative behavior on all counts. You can of course make a point for the African American community's lacking in business and other skills for many social ailments. Historically, you would need to agree to a shared responsibility on the part of whites and blacks for racist and unprogressive agendas that plumbed Detroit. Why not recognize the faults amd move toward betterment? Why harken for a time of miserable conditions by voting for neanderthals like Trump and Patterson? Coleman Young was bitter, but he had more reason to be than any other mayor in the USofA at that time.
    Young inherited a declining city but instead of reaching out for a solution, used the caustic situation to further his power and attempt to line his pockets.
    Brooks is guilty of using the same situation to build up his county. He was just in a better position to do it at the time. C.Y. had less money to play with and Brooks had a growing revenue base. Can you blame people for wanting to live where they get the services they paid for.
    Couple that with other social ailments and you get a bankrupt Detroit.
    Pump all the federal dollars you want into it but it was what it was.
    I always believed the neighborhoods would save Detroit. But once drugs and other crime invaded those havens, people said ENOUGH is ENOUGH and out they moved. Who cared if a new sports arena was built or if the People mover was built or if Cobo was expanded. Detroit was just a nice place to visit. Not to live.
    Last edited by GMan; November-25-16 at 04:23 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.