It sounds like some of the comments in this thread are implicitly tying an increase in the white population to a revival of the city and an overall population rebound. I don't think that native-born middle class whites moving in is a good barometer of whether the city has mitigated the population losses. Obviously it doesn't hurt to have middle class whites moving in but that demographic generally isn't the accurate litmus test for broad increases in population. Chicago is an excellent example of why.
I think the most accurate measure of this is whether Detroit's foreign born population is showing a meaningful increase. For instance, NYC had stopped its population losses through foreign immigration decades before gentrification became a word.
Bookmarks