Quote Originally Posted by Wesley Mouch View Post
Where are the progressives here who should be screaming this from the rooftop. The adjustment should be progressive. First $25,000 or so exempt from change, then say 50% on the rest until 100% when over $35,000.For gosh sake, let's be progressive.

[[And if that law doesn't allow that, its just plain wrong.
I don't think it is that there is a law against it so much that there will be court cases by the high rollers if everyone doesn't take an equal percentage cut. Possibly the union could show leadership for once and convince the retirees to have a "progressive" allocation of cuts.