That's great. I'd like to be able to decide. Just as soon as the DDA and DEGC develop a real plan for analyzing the structural integrity of all those buildings and making the information publicly available so everybody can have some input. Then we'll have the benefit of their wisdom when putting together a plan. Wouldn't that be Step One in any reasonable effort to develop, redevelop and demolish? But I don't see any of that happening. What I see is somebody who can talk numbers, berate people for having an alternate vision, but apparently can't spell the name of the park his old employer is going to "save." In fact, I see an increasingly whiny, upset, small-minded person who is so obsessed with defending his old employer's thesis that he looks increasingly desperate.
Right now, they're ALL left open for scrappers to get into them. And then we have to demolish them because they've been neglected.
I already gave some ideas for cuts. Did you see those?
Oh, I already answered that question. Did you miss that?
And, by the way, that is exactly the sort of rhetoric that makes you look desperate, condescending, out of touch, and totally unsympathetic. In short, if your attitude is anything like the attitude of a typical DDA or DEGC staffer, then the people who distrust those organizations would seem to have an accurate estimation of them.
That is a false choice. We don't have light rail.
Bookmarks