Great idea except the thugs have roughly 13 children each, all neglected worse than the last, so the cycle continues.
At least I hope so.
I 100% agree. This is a problem that needs to be addressed, and I hope that the new generation of policymakers and thinkers make progress on this. I also know that if the bottom 10% of the socioeconomic ladder make up 90% of the social problems and anti-social behavior, there's no way that the bottom 30% of the same ladders will have the resources to make any progress on the problems.But that's the thing, no one has the cure for the infection. We've simply been shuffling the deck of chairs around. Until recently, everyone's been fleeing to the suburbs to get away from the contagious infection in the city, and now that the infection is spreading to the suburbs, everyone's moving back to the city. In the midst of all of this shuffling of course, the infection itself has not been addressed.
The shuffling is necessary to create a de facto redistribution of wealth/resources available to address these problems. Having rich people move into the city and become emotionally invested in the city is an important prerequisite to making any progress on this.
I don't have all the answers on this, and I agree that if re-shuffling population is the only solution, then we will get nowhere.
The 2% of the nations population cause 98% of the problems. It is a Log-Normal [[Pareto) distribution.I 100% agree. This is a problem that needs to be addressed, and I hope that the new generation of policymakers and thinkers make progress on this. I also know that if the bottom 10% of the socioeconomic ladder make up 90% of the social problems and anti-social behavior, there's no way that the bottom 30% of the same ladders will have the resources to make any progress on the problems.
Thanks for the replies. It takes a bit of time to be able to read between the lines online.
|
Bookmarks