Belanger Park River Rouge
ON THIS DATE IN DETROIT HISTORY - DOWNTOWN PONTIAC »



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 27 of 27
  1. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by corktownyuppie View Post
    http://deadlinedetroit.com/articles/...e#.UdGnzjTVCSo

    Barrow states:



    Ok, obviously, I can't imagine that any ruling would apply to Duggan's eligibility as a write-in candidate, but I'm open to legal argument that he isn't.

    Any comment?[/FONT][/COLOR]
    I got nothin'. Duggan will have certainly met the minimum requirements regarding residency & length of time being a registered Detroit voter at the time he files his write-in paperwork with the clerk. Barrow seems to be stretching on this one, but I'll be waiting to see the decision.

    By the way, I don't see anything wrong with Barrow or anyone else trying to ensure the election process has been followed. That SHOULD be the clerk's job. The integrity of the election process should be maintained. Maybe Barrow should run for City Clerk if this mayoral bid doesn't work out again.

  2. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zug View Post
    I really, really hate saying Barrow may have a point [[I am a Duggan supporter...though not a hardcore one). But the order did say that Duggan is ineligible to be a candidate for Mayor of the City of Detroit in the August 6, 2013 primary election. To the best of my knowledge, there was no distinction between "candidate" and "write-in candidate." [[Is there a legal distinction between these?) However, filing as a write-in isn't technically being a candidate, is it? I thought it was more like "if I get enough votes, I intend to accept the decision [[be it to go on the primary ballot, or to take the office)." If I am wrong, someone can correct me.
    Not sure I agree. Here is actual opinion.

    "We hold that Duggan has not met the qualifications for elected office by the plain terms contained in the charter. We also hold that the durational residency requirement neither implicates, nor violates, the constitutionally based right to travel. Consequently, where Duggan has failed to meet the charter requirements for elective office, his name may not appear on the ballot. Plaintiff thus has a clear legal right to have Duggan’s name removed from the list of candidates and the Commission has a clear legal duty to perform this ministerial act"

    the opinion is based off his original candidacy filing. But now he meets residency requirement so that is a moot issue.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.