Michigan Central Restored and Opening
RESTORED MICHIGAN CENTRAL DEPOT OPENS »



Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 47

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Governor signs ban on partner benefits for unmarried public employees


  2. #2

    Default

    Right now, it seems public universities are exempt, because of the state constitution...but for how long? Or until the State Supreme's rule in favor of this ban.. of course Snyder says it wasn't his priority, but the will of the legislature.

  3. #3

    Default

    The best thing that happened to the GOP Legislature was Rick Snyder. Snyder reminded everyone that he is a businessman and a nerd and this is true but over and over he proves he is no politician. The GOP-controlled House and Senate can pass a bill and Snyder, a novice in the game just plays along and signs away. I get it. He is a Republican and Republicans are passing these bills but I would like see him question the purpose for the bill that they want him to sign.

  4. #4

    Default

    Man, fuck this guy. I tried to keep an open mind about him even though I didn't vote for him, but I'm done. His whole pragmatic Bill Milliken shtick has amounted to exactly jackshit. The only remotely good thing he did was to not turn down high-speed rail grants like those knuckle-draggers Walker and Kasich.

    Oh, and if Dave Agema comes on the fucking radio one more time, I'm probably gonna toss it out the window. Worst. Legislator. Ever.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    The governor should be ashamed. He won't get my vote.

    The sad thing is that he was supposedly elected because of his business credentials. How are you improving Michigan's business climate when you scare away anyone who believes in equality under the law?

    Shame on him and those that supported this legislation.

  6. #6

    Default

    One more reason to LEAVE michigan...

  7. #7

    Default

    Score one for outstate yahoos and demagogues like McMillin and Glenn.

  8. #8

    Default

    it seems uncharacteristic of snyder to sign this

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1953 View Post
    it seems uncharacteristic of snyder to sign this
    Snyder was given the message the day he walked thru the door: "if you play along, we'll get along."

    I think we got a clear idea who's running the state when Snyder couldn't get his fellow Republicans to support the Richard Snyder Memorial Bridge over the Detroit River. Snyder don't want to ruffle feathers in Lansing because he is a nerd surrounded by political sharks.

  10. #10
    Occurrence Guest

    Default

    I'd be embarrassed if I voted for this turd. Did anyone here vote for this guy? If so, why? What do you think of him signing this bill?

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Occurrence View Post
    I'd be embarrassed if I voted for this turd. Did anyone here vote for this guy? If so, why? What do you think of him signing this bill?
    Since no one has admitted to voting for him, let me be the first. Yes, I voted for Rick Snyder because I believed he would run the state as a moderate Republican [[yeah, right) and his lack of political experience wouldn't tempt him to go rogue [[huh) and become a partisan hack. He attempted to pass himself as a William Milliken Republican, one who can work with Democrats and I heard how he wanted to help make Detroit a great city again and I said why not.

    Rick Snyder is a fraud. His lack of political moxy hurts him more than it helps him. The Republican hacks in Lansing knows that Snyder is a light-weight and they can send him any bill they pass and he will sign it, no questions asked. The residents of this state got to see how much weight Snyder carries in this state [[the answer is zero weight) when a GOP majority committee voted down his publicly-built bridge. This is a Republican governor right, but every bill that the GOP passes, he just signs away with no questions asked and he is always attempting to put a spin to how it is going to help the citizens of the great state of Michigan.

    I am not gay so the bill that Snyder just signed doesn't affect me but when we as a people become so heartless that we will engage in class warfare? The Republicans will claim that denying benefits to same-sex couples would save money but how do I benefit from the state denying people because of who they want to be with? After all, the state worker does have to work for those benefits. Is that the reason why people get up in the morning. To preserve those benefits they worked hard to get.

    Snyder lost me when he wholeheartedly signed the "EFM on steroids" bill because the GOP was complaining that Obama was appointing "czars" with unlimited power yet the Republicans in this state was willing to make a man or woman into a dictator and claim that the ends justify the means. Snyder could have vetoed this claiming that a single man or woman with unlimited power could be dangerous but because he is wet behind the ears and his handlers know more about power, he signed it. The only difference between he and Walker and Kasich and Haley is that they have been in the game a bit longer than he has but their objective is the same: to suck the life out of the people.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Occurrence View Post
    I'd be embarrassed if I voted for this turd. Did anyone here vote for this guy? If so, why? What do you think of him signing this bill?


    Voted for him, you really think Virg was a better choice?

    Don't know all the ins and outs of this bill. Do know that in every business, private, public, whatever there are a lot of slugs that screw over benefit packages. If this is a "solution" to stop some of it, so be it.

    BTW, a Virg vote or even worse a Stabenow vote, now that's embarrassing.

  13. #13

    Default

    ...out of the Democratic state legislators, how many signed on?

  14. #14

    Default

    You get what you vote for Michigan!!!

  15. #15

    Default

    I've really liked this governor a lot. However, this decision is very disappointing. Folks ought to have the same rights, including the right to marry whoever they want and share their benefits with their spouse.

    I just don't get why some people are so afraid of gay people. It's their life! If they're gay, let them be gay. We don't need anyone enforcing their morality on us.

  16. #16

    Default

    What a complete dill-wad- I know of a good friend who is in IT, was offered a job here, and decided to stay in Illinois because of this stupiity. Great, lord knows we would not want well-educated, well earning people to come here, or give those that are here the boot-

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cinderpath View Post
    What a complete dill-wad- I know of a good friend who is in IT, was offered a job here, and decided to stay in Illinois because of this stupiity. Great, lord knows we would not want well-educated, well earning people to come here, or give those that are here the boot-
    I have relatives that moved away because of the lack of benefits here before the previous law was passed, now I'm sure we'll lose a lot more people.

    You'd think a state with a shrinking tax base would want to attract smart people....but instead we try our hardest to make them all leave.

  18. #18

    Default

    This guy is a clown. I hope he lasts just one term. I can understand the reasoning for cutting deadbeats off of welfare who work the system, but he shows no compassion for those that really need it the most. And his timing is perfect, he does this during the second worst recession in US history. Last one out of Michigan, turn out the lights.
    Last edited by Cincinnati_Kid; December-24-11 at 01:51 AM.

  19. #19

    Default

    I see this as being consistent with previous legislation that increased the cost of medical insurance on all public employees. He is trying to reduce the cost of government on the backs of those he relies on to administer it.

    I understand why he has done this, but he needs to remember not every public employee is making a lot of money. I know that if I chose to work in the private sector I would be under these rules, but I would be making considerably more money. Most of us have already had our salaries and benefits cut by previous actions. I would suspect that once things turn around again many of the better and brighter employees will high tail it out leaving him with only the lazy govt employees. Penny wise, pound foolish.

  20. #20
    SteveJ Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DetroitPlanner View Post
    I see this as being consistent with previous legislation that increased the cost of medical insurance on all public employees. He is trying to reduce the cost of government on the backs of those he relies on to administer it.

    I understand why he has done this, but he needs to remember not every public employee is making a lot of money. I know that if I chose to work in the private sector I would be under these rules, but I would be making considerably more money. Most of us have already had our salaries and benefits cut by previous actions. I would suspect that once things turn around again many of the better and brighter employees will high tail it out leaving him with only the lazy govt employees. Penny wise, pound foolish.
    Amen. The morale is pretty low in our department. Nobody seems to care anymore. The public thinks we all make 150k a year and can retire at 39 with 250k pensions. My friends in the private sector make more money than me and get bonuses etc... All I get is furlough days, pay freezes, and doubling of my health insurance.

  21. #21

    Default

    "My friends in the private sector make more money than me and get bonuses etc..."


    And, generally, it's been that way for a very long time. Outrageous examples of retired public employees are used to paint the masses. During the "prosperous" 90s up until the "crash" we were getting busy and wild and willy with our massive government income of 50 Gees [[for a family four) while our corporate buds were just barely scrapping buy on 6 figure incomes.

    It was so bad for these folks that they would commonly ridicule us for working in the public sector; always calling us suckers for educating their children while they we off partying and driving themselves into massive debt with their sleds, quads and strip club handouts.

    Yeah, we tried to keep up with those Jones's and Smith's but after a while we jumped outta that game. Now, these folks are screaming at us because now they're all bankrupt and we didn't have to go through that. I guess we're just awful people who do not deserve a fucking drop of good times; public sector folk don't deserve anything more than what the Jones's don't have.

    Now excuse me while I light up one of my fine Cuban's with one of my many Bennies while I cook up my breakfast of 4 inch steaks, 18 lbs lobsters and imported Russian caviar

  22. #22

    Default

    In other words, the govt. only want couples that breed them future slaves.

  23. #23

    Default

    Wouldn't problems like this be eliminated if Michigan just moved into the 21st Century and legalized Gay marriage?

  24. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 313WX View Post
    Wouldn't problems like this be eliminated if Michigan just moved into the 21st Century and legalized Gay marriage?
    No. Unmarried couples does not equal gay. Incidentally not all public employees had this benefit, but it was permitted by the State. It would be up to the City, County, University, or whomever to make the decision they seemed fit. What this does is essentially hand tie the government entities by banning it in hopes that it would be an improvement.

  25. #25
    SteveJ Guest

    Default

    Believe me, their is very very little fraud with public employee benefits at the state level. Unless you can show me proof, I don't think you have a clue.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.