Presidential Preference Quiz

"Answer the following questions and we'll match your results to the [[remaining) 2012 Presidential election candidates." 22 weighted questions.

This isn't going to change anyone's mind but there might be a small surprise or two regarding relative preferences. My results gave Romney and the Republican Party a higher percentage than I would have for instance but agreeing with Obama and the Democratic party about 40% of the time seemed about right.

Not to be shy; my scores:
Paul 89, Romney 82, Gingrich 51, Obama 40
Libertarian 85, Republican 72, Democratic 40, Green 30

edited to add the link [[thank you rb)

http://www.isidewith.com/presidential-election-quiz

um, where was this?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oladub

"Answer the following questions and we'll match your results to the [[remaining) 2012 Presidential election candidates." 22 weighted questions.

This isn't going to change anyone's mind but there might be a small surprise or two regarding relative preferences. My results gave Romney and the Republican Party a higher percentage than I would have for instance but agreeing with Obama and the Democratic party about 40% of the time seemed about right.

Not to be shy; my scores:
Paul 89, Romney 82, Gingrich 51, Obama 40
Libertarian 85, Republican 72, Democratic 40, Green 30

---

No linky, no stinky:

Attachment 13129
FAIL

http://www.isidewith.com/presidential-election-quiz

I'm 87% with Kent Mesplay

Interesting oladub.

My results: Paul 94%, Romney 85%, Wrights 73%, Gary Johnson 73%
Libertarian 88%, Repub 77%, Dem 47%, Green 23%

I was a bit surprised, because I put Ron Paul in the same loony category as H. Ross Perot - some good ideas in a very bad package.

The quiz is bunk.... My results have me voting for Romney, but I honestly could not do that even if I held my breath and wore a blindfold.



75% Republican


63% Libertarian

62% Democratic

53% Green

So, how come I never heard of Kent Mesplay before this test? He and Barack are just about tied for me, along with Fred Karger who I have heard of. I do not side with Mittens on any major issues [[but I already knew that).

I'm embarrassed to say since they threw Jimmy McMillan in the mix. But screw it:

Obama 98%
Mitt Romney 82%
Fred Karger 75%
Jimmy McMillan 64%

Democrat 98%
Republican 62%

Nothing there suprises me except for who is Fred Karger?

I'm aligned with Kent Mesplay even ahead of Obama. That was a shocker for me

I almost didn't take the test. I decided long ago to align my vote with Obama so haven't paid much attention to the political vitrole. Kent Mesplay came out 1st for me with Obama second. Embarrassed I have no clue who Kent Mesplay is.

Kent Mesplay is a Green Party presidential candidate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Mesplay

Presumably, you are more liberal than President Obama, particularly on green issues.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oladub

Kent Mesplay is a Green Party presidential candidate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Mesplay

Presumably, you are more liberal than President Obama, particularly on green issues.

---

not hard to do, since Obama is very far from "liberal" anywhere else but the US. That's what happens when one party lets its extremists gain control. They'd call Reagan a liberal for wanting to raise Cap Gains to the same level as earned wages and granting amnesty to illegals. They'd call Ike and Nixon Socialists

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rb336

I'm 87% with Kent Mesplay

---

Me too. And 77% with Obama. Of course, I don't know who made this quiz and what they are using to measure the various candidates' stances.

So, Oladub : What were the questions that aligned you with Paul?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maxx

So, Oladub : What were the questions that aligned you with Paul?

---

Maxx, I had to do it over to answer your question.
Economy 97%, Social Policy 94%, Domestic Policy 92% were the three categories above my 89/90% score for Paul. On Science and Environment, I scored higher with Obama than Paul although my total score for Obama was 40/24% the two times I took it. I was at 11% with Obama on economics. The three economic questions had to do with federal minimum wage, bank bailouts, and raising the debt ceiling. I voted no on all three and heavily weighted the last two.

76% Green.
54% Libertarian
36% Democratic
7% Republican

76% with Kent Mesplay
66% with Gary Johnson
46% Jimmy McMillan
44% Fred KArger
41% Ron Paul
41% R. Lee Wrights
36% Barack OBama
9% Mitt Romney
8% Newt Gingrich
7% Buddy Roemer

87% Domestic Policy with Kent Mesplay
91% Foreign Policy with Gary Johnson
75% Healthcare with Gary Johnson
77% Immigration with Barack Obama
95% Economy with Kent Mesplay
90% Social with Kent Mesplay
84% Environment with Kent Mesplay
100% Scienece with Barack Barack Obama and Fred Karger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maxx

... I don't know who made this quiz and what they are using to measure the various candidates' stances.

---

According to DNS Frog, LinkedIn, Facebook, and other sources, Nick Boutelier is responsible for iSideWith.

Mediashift article about iSideWith ==> "Political 'Matchmaking' Sites ElectNext, iSideWith Help Voters Decide" by Mark Hannah, March 7, 2012.

-------------------------------------
My iSideWith results:

69% Kent Mesplay
68% Barack Obama
57% Gary Johnson
28% Fred Karger
20% Ron Paul
12% Mitt Romney

69% Green
68% Democratic
30% Libertarian
2% Republican

Things are not going in the right direction under Obama....

Grocery Prices Heading Higher:
http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_new...t-lingers?lite

Retail Sales Drop For The 3rd Straight Month:
http://money.msn.com/business-news/a...16&id=15333351

US Companies Scaling Back Hiring Plans:
http://money.msn.com/business-news/a...16&id=15331638

2012 Gains Wither:
http://money.msn.com/business-news/a...16&id=15332925

African American Unemployment Continues To Rise:
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/melissa-h...perry/48184135

In June, the unemployment rate was unchanged at 8.2 percent, and the number of unemployed persons was 12.7 million.
http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2012/ted_20120710.htm


It's too bad Obama ran unchallenged for the Democrat nomination,
because his record is terrible!



NOT the right attitude to turn this country around:
Obama - 'If you’ve got a business -- you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen'
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...ss-you-didnt-/

So you are blaming the drought that is going to cause higher grocery prices on Obama?

How about this:
The republicans YET AGAIN block a bill to offer TAX CREDITS to companies expanding their US payroll, and YET AGAIN refuse to get rid of the tax credits for moving jobs overseas. Why was that NOT covered in the allegedly "liberal" press? If the press were indeed liberal, that would have been the above-the-fold headline all over the country, yet it barely got a mention

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Papasito

Things are not going in the right direction under Obama....

Grocery Prices Heading Higher:
http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_new...t-lingers?lite




Retail Sales Drop For The 3rd Straight Month:
http://money.msn.com/business-news/a...16&id=15333351

US Companies Scaling Back Hiring Plans:
http://money.msn.com/business-news/a...16&id=15331638

2012 Gains Wither:
http://money.msn.com/business-news/a...16&id=15332925

African American Unemployment Continues To Rise:
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/melissa-h...perry/48184135

In June, the unemployment rate was unchanged at 8.2 percent, and the number of unemployed persons was 12.7 million.
http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2012/ted_20120710.htm


It's too bad Obama ran unchallenged for the Democrat nomination,
because his record is terrible!



NOT the right attitude to turn this country around:
Obama - 'If you’ve got a business -- you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen'
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...ss-you-didnt-/

---

LOL !!

You take the concept of causality to heights we have never seen before

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by firstandten

LOL !!

You take the concept of causality to heights we have never seen before

---

so you would say real causality is a casualty of Papasito's arguments?

a new version is out.
http://www.isidewith.com

I side with:
Jill Stein, 76% [[healthcare, foreign policy, social and immigration)
Barack Obama, 75% [[economic, environmental, social and foreign policy)
Stewart Alexander, 61% [[healthcare,, social and immigration)
Ron Paul, 44% [[domestic policy and environmental)
Jimmy McMillan, 28% [[social)
Mitt Romney, 13% [[environmental - michigan's trees ARE the right height!)
Virgil Goode, 6%

Michigan voters, 58%
US voters, 57%

I side with:
Mitt Romney 98%
Ron Paul 92%
Gary Johnson 91%
Barack Obama 30%

NM voters 93%
US voters 86%

Repubs 98%
Libertarian 92%
Dems 30%
Greens 11%

I was somewhat surprised by my results:

Jill Stein 90%
Barack Obama 82%
Stewart Alexander 75%
Ron Paul 62%
Mitt Romney 44%

Greens 90%
Dems 82%
Libertarian 62%
Repubs 44%

commenting on new version rb provided
http://www.isidewith.com

Paul 96%
Romney 91%
Johnson 87%
McMillan 76%
Stein 20%
Obama 13%
Alexander 10%

Libertarian 94%
Republican 91%
Green 20%
Democrat 13%

Agreed with
Wisconsin voters 75%
US voters 78%

I'm shocked. I pride myself on being moderate, but never expected to grouped with Mitt Romney. Oh well. I'm about even in support with Romney and Obama, which is close to accurate. Really, I'd rather whichever party controls the White House doesn't control Congress. I like mixed government. To keep those in power honest you need someone on the other side to do it.

http://www.isidewith.com/results/18233882

Barack Obama - 75%
Gary Johnson - 74%
Ron Paul - 68%
Jill Stein - 64%
Stewart Alexander - 63%
Jimmy McMillan - 58%
Mitt Romney - 20%
Virgil Goode - 19%

Michigan Voters - 61%
American Voters - 55%

Democratic - 75%
Libertarian - 71%
Green - 68%
Republican - 20%

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crumbled_pavement

I'm shocked. I pride myself on being moderate, but never expected to grouped with Mitt Romney. Oh well. I'm about even in support with Romney and Obama, which is close to accurate. Really, I'd rather whichever party controls the White House doesn't control Congress. I like mixed government. To keep those in power honest you need someone on the other side to do it.

http://www.isidewith.com/results/18233882

---

In theory it sounds good and in a perfect world probably the way government should work.
However in the legislative branch when because of filibustering you need a supermajority in the Senate and in the House where it was stated that we will vote no on anything the President presents without even hearing him out, then thats a recipe for dyfunctional, gridlocked government like we have now.