Quote:
And LA transit share has actually dropped since rail was reintroduced. It isn't 350k rail passengers, you made that up. Overall non-linked transit trips are around 300k [[so probably around 100k riders), which is horrible ridership, much lower than that of small cities like Boston, San Francisco, Montreal, DC and Philly.
I got those numbers from LA County Metro. Those 350,000 daily passengers beat the piss out of Detroit's transit ridership [[this is double the *combined* ridership of DDOT and SMART, and doesn't even include LA's expansive bus network), and make LA one of the top-ten busiest rail systems in the country. But hey, since you're the king of flexible metrics, you'll find fault with this too.
Quote:
No, you got caught lying. Visit LA, take the bus with no one but desperately poor undocumented immigrants, and report back to us on your transit-oriented utopia, the one with 16-lane freeways, giant garages everywhere, and the world's most celebrated auto culture.
Editorialize much? I've never seen you post a single damned FACT anywhere. Maybe you could try that. Just once would be nice.