Originally Posted by
Mikeg
Let's keep it civil, please? I didn't try to negatively characterize you and I wish you would treat me with the same courtesy. Of course, we all know that there is a glaring double standard on this forum when it comes to name-calling.
Now for that "middle ground" approach you'd like to see employed when it comes to permitting graffiti, just exactly where do you think it should be permitted [[pick as many as you need to turn that gray "middle ground" description into something more black & white and actionable)?
a) clearly abandoned private property
b) vacant private property
c) any private property [[except your own, of course)
d) publicly owned bridges, walkways. roads, etc
e) publicly owned parks
f) publicly owned vacant or abandoned buildings
g) publicly owned and occupied buildings
h) any public property
i) all of the above but only if the graffiti "artist" has their own web site and/or has had their "work" shown in an art gallery or has been similarly celebrated