This appears to have been old guy's source from American Road & Transportation Builders Association:
State Bridge Profile — Michigan
Maybe that will help.
[[Oops, I didn't break up the rightmost column. :))
This appears to have been old guy's source from American Road & Transportation Builders Association:
State Bridge Profile — Michigan
Maybe that will help.
[[Oops, I didn't break up the rightmost column. :))
That photo of the plywood or whatever on the bridge is something I've never seen before.[/QUOTE]
Actually it's a common band aid for overpasses that are scaling concrete. When someone else is driving just look up when you go under, it will not take long to spot the plywood.
It is shameful that politicians in Washington and Lansing have continuously kicked this can down the road for way to long now. Good infrastructure is critical to a healthy economy not to mention that people get killed when its neglected.
No, more likely just a mundane miscoded database entry. They may have swapped the "on" and "over" for the bridge. If they used aggregated numbers, you would get some crazy results at freeway interchanges.
It looks crazy to us because it is so obviously talking about the bridge carrying the wrong traffic. The road being an urban minor arterial should have raised a red flag on their end, though.